Highlight
It should be recognized that not all dairy products exhibit a beneficial role in preventing type-2 diabetes, except low-fat dairy foods, especially yogurt, while most other dairy foods have no association.
Introduction
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) affects approximately 463 million adults worldwide, a number that is estimated to reach 700 million by 2045 [1]. T2D is a major public health concern, as 1 in 11 adults globally have T2D [2]. In addition to genetic and environmental factors, risk factors for T2D include advanced age, race/ethnicity, obesity, physical inactivity, high blood pressure, and sedentary lifestyle [3-5]. Thus, it is essential to identify modifiable risk factors causing T2D. Dairy products are important constituents of any diet, and the hormones present in dairy products, especially milk, are considered essential for growth and immunity. Dairy products such as milk, yogurt, cheese, and butter are considered essential for building healthy bones, teeth, gums, and maintaining a healthy weight because they are rich in calcium, vitamin D, vitamin A, magnesium, zinc, and protein [6]. Calcium and vitamins that are present in dairy products assist with blood coagulation during injuries, protect nerves from damage, and help to build strong muscles [7]. However, evidence also suggests that consumption of dairy products promotes hormonal imbalances that may lead to several diseases, such as T2D [8], obesity [9], cardiometabolic syndrome [10], and certain types of cancer [11].
In addition to their basic nutritional role, dairy products also contain a wide variety of hormones that mediate specific physiologic and pathologic functions of the endocrine system [12]. In the distant past, certain conflicts have been raised regarding dairy consumption as a contributing factor for developing T2D. Several prospective cohort studies, case-control studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses have assessed this association. The majority of their findings revealed an inverse relationship (i.e., protective effect) between dairy consumption and T2D risk. Although only a few studies conducted detailed analyses of a variety of dairy subgroups, the role and exact mechanisms of dairy products on metabolic diseases such as T2D remain unclear. Almost all studies have inferred a beneficial role of dairy products in preventing T2D; however, a remarkable number of studies showed either positive or no association of specific dairy foods with incidence of T2D. These results were not highlighted or prioritized in study conclusions. Some studies have underreported the harmful or nonassociation findings by not considering statistical significance, resulting in misinterpretation of results. Some results were not reflected in conclusions, and only the inverse association of dairy consumption was highlighted by ignoring other essential findings. Thus, this review places special emphasis on consumption of different dairy products and risk of T2D. The authors attempt to clarify this issue by drawing insight from many high-quality studies conducted around the world using real-world data. This will add to the current literature and assist the public in making informed decisions. A thorough search was conducted using electronic scientific databases of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Studies that addressed this research question between 2004 to 2019 were included in this review.
Under- and overreporting and misinterpretation of findings
1. Evidence from epidemiologic studies
In a study using data from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, authors reported that risk of T2D decreased by 9% with an increase in total dairy intake by one serving per day. Thus, they concluded that dairy intake was associated with a modestly lower risk of T2D. However, multivariable relative risk (RR) for whole milk suggested that, compared to those who consumed whole milk less than once per month, there was a 19% higher risk of T2D for those who drank whole milk more than twice a week (RR, 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0–1.43). This result was not reflected in their conclusions [13]. In a large prospective study, researchers inferred that an increase in dairy intake by one serving per day would lower the risk of T2D by 4%. However, the confidence interval for RR crossed the level of no association (RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93–1.01) [14]. In a Japan Public Health Center-based prospective study considering multivariable odds ratio with 95% CI (OR, 0.71; 0.51-0.98), the authors reported that dairy food intake was significantly associated with a lower risk of T2D among women; however, the probability value suggests lack of significance at P=0.054 [15].
Authors of the Blue Mountains Eye Study conducted in Australia concluded that there was no association between total dairy intake and risk of T2D, ignoring that people who had reduced/low-fat dairy foods exhibited 101% higher odds of metabolic syndrome/T2D, when comparing the highest quartile with the lowest quartile in a fully adjusted model (2.01, 95% CI 1.05–3.83; P=0.043) [16]. In 2014, a nested case-control study conducted by O'Connor et al. [17] in the United Kingdom concluded that low-fat fermented dairy intake was associated with decreased risk of T2D. However, these implications were concluded by comparing only tertile 3 vs. tertile 1 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.60–0.99; P=0.049). The upper confidence interval and P-value were near the limit of nonsignificance. Furthermore, this association is not observed when tertile 2 is compared with tertile 1 (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.69–1.16). Similar conclusions were reached on yogurt intake, which was not significant when comparing tertile 2 with tertile 1 (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.64–1.10); the results were not well-stated [17]. In another prospective study conducted in China, the authors concluded that dairy consumption was associated with significantly lower risk of T2D. However, multivariable RRs for the fully adjusted model (i.e., model 4) inferred nonsignificant results with all dairy products considered in the study when comparing the highest intake quartiles with the lowest quartiles i.e., total dairy products (RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.63–1.05; P=0.07), milk (RR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.77–1.12; P=0.45), and total dairy without milk (RR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.58–1.03; P=0.11). These comparisons were not considered in the study conclusions [18].
In the nested case-control Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study, the authors concluded a 27% significantly lower risk of T2D per 100 g/day total dairy consumption. This was actually nonsignificant with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.52– 1.02), and no significant findings were observed between any of the tertiles. Moreover, crude analysis revealed that men who consume cheese had 94% higher odds of T2D by comparing the highest tertile with the lowest tertile (1.94; 95% CI, 1.0–3.75) [19]. In a cross-sectional study conducted in the Netherlands, the authors reported inverse association between skim milk dairy, fermented dairy, and buttermilk and onset of prediabetes; however, these results were actually nonsignificant (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97–1.00; OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97–0.99; and OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.94–1.00; respectively) [20]. In a population-based Singapore Chinese Health Study, the authors reported that dairy intake was significantly associated with reduced T2D risk when all other quartiles were compared with the lowest quartile. However, their HRs at 95% CI revealed that associations were nonsignificant for the second, third, and fourth quartiles of dairy intake, i.e., 0.98 (0.91–1.06), 0.96 (0.89–1.03), and 0.90 (0.83–0.98), respectively [21]. In a recent EPIC-InterAct study with a nested case-control design, the authors concluded inverse association between cheese intake (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.76–1.02) and combined fermented dairy intake (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78–0.99) and incidence of T2D. These results are actually not statistically significant, which was not reflected in their conclusion [22].
2. Possible reasons for disparities in results
First, the majority of studies have collected data through questionnaire-based responses. This potentially affects results due to recall bias and self-reported information [23-29]. Second, variations in diagnosis cutoffs among studies might give rise to differences in incident cases of T2D. Third, very few studies considered prediabetes as an outcome in assessing its relationship with dairy consumption, which may underestimate the actual risk of T2D [20,23]. Although the food frequency questionnaires utilized in these studies are extensively validated, there is an inevitable chance for measurement errors in capturing accurate data related to dairy and other foods that might incorporate certain disparities into the results [30]. Also, because most of these studies were observational in design, causal inference was not possible. Residual confounding is possible and might account for some of the differences in findings among studies [26-31]. Importantly, the findings of each study have limited generalizability to other populations with different characteristics.
3. Evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analysis
In a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis published in 2013, the authors reported and concluded that yogurt intake is inversely associated with risk of T2D. However, this result was not statistically significant, i.e., RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.82–1.00. Furthermore, the conclusions were only directed toward products that are inversely associated. This ignores certain products, such as full-fat dairy, total milk, full-fat milk, cream, and fermented dairy products, which are positively or not associated with risk of dairy intake on T2D [32]. In another systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies, the authors reported that total dairy and low-fat dairy were inversely associated with risk of T2D (RR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95–1.00; P=0.04 and RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.92–1.00; P=0.072). However, the upper confidence intervals for both products cross the level of nonsignificance, and one of the probability values is not significant [33].
Heterogeneity in findings among studies
Although a study by Chen et al. [34] in 2015 noted a significantly reduced risk of T2D with yogurt intake (0.82; 0.70–0.96), there is substantial variation in heterogeneity across studies (I2=65.3%). In a similar study by Gijsbers et al. [33], considerable variation due to heterogeneity was observed with some dairy products and risk of T2D, including total dairy (I2=66%), low-fat dairy (I2=68%), yogurt (I2=73%), and ice cream (I2=86%) [33]. In a recent meta-analysis, significant heterogeneity was observed in RR of low-fat dairy (I2=65.6%) and rate ratios for total dairy (I2=78%) and low-fat dairy (I2=78.3%), although they exhibited an inverse association [35]. Although low-fat dairy and yogurt have shown inverse relationships with risk of dairy on T2D, there is remarkable variation in dispersion of effect sizes, with I2=94% and I2=70%, respectively [36]. Lastly, findings from a dose-response meta-analysis by Gao et al. [32] inferred that total dairy (I2=65.4%), yogurt (I2=74%), and cheese (I2=59%) had an inverse association with T2D. However, these results also exhibit high heterogeneity across studies [32].
Discussion
Although most of the studies projected significant reduction in risk of T2D with dairy consumption, the above statement holds true only for certain food products such as low-fat dairy, particularly yogurt and cheese. Notably, other studies showed no association with low-fat dairy [16], yogurt, and cheese intake [19], on incidence of T2D. Through this review, the authors intend to demonstrate that not all dairy foods have a beneficial role in preventing T2D, as most dairy foods (butter, sour/whipped cream, ice creams, whole/skim milk, dairy desserts, unfermented products, and whole/full/high-fat dairy foods) showed not statistically significant findings. Conversely, a few studies have shown harmful effects of dairy, especially whole milk or unfermented milk [13], low-fat dairy [16], and cheese [19].
Even after extensive research investigating the link between dairy consumption and risk of T2D, there is a wide range of mixed findings resulting in significant uncertainty. Additional studies exploring confounding factors such as race, geographic localization, ethnicity, dietary patterns, food intake behavior, and lifestyle factors are needed to ascertain the potential detrimental effects that may have had a role in contributing to these disparate conclusions. The public should consider multiple factors, including study generalizability, when drawing conclusions about the association of dairy and T2D. Decisions should not rely only on study conclusions, as most studies focus on the positive outcomes and ignore neutral or negative findings. We suggest that both favorable and unfavorable findings should be reported to allow readers and the public to make informed decisions. Researchers should consider both statistical and clinical significance and prioritize confidence intervals rather than P-values when interpreting study findings. Study results should be appropriately interpreted to prevent under- and overreporting, and conclusions should correspond with results. After considering all available evidence, dairy products as part of a healthy diet plan do not show harmful effects on glycemic control. However, the potential benefits of dairy consumption on plasma glucose level, insulin sensitivity, and other T2D-related outcomes warrant future investigations with long-term, well-designed clinical trials.
In conclusion, not all dairy products exhibit a beneficial role in preventing T2D. Low-fat dairy foods, especially yogurt, do have a beneficial role, while most other dairy foods show no association. Readers and the public should maintain caution when assessing new studies and consider heterogeneity, generalizability, and statistical and clinical significance when making decisions.
PDF Links
PubReader
ePub Link
XML Download
Full text via DOI
Download Citation
Print
